Skip to main content

Senate Bill 09-10-04

Bill ID: 09-10-04
Name: Review of Faculty Merit Review Policy
Proposed: 09/03/2009
Sponsor: Lee Preston, Faculty Ombudsperson
Proposal: Review of the existing Faculty Merit Review Policy and its implementation.
Active? No


Status

Status: Completed
Completed On: 05/04/2010

History

Status: Complete
Related Files:

Status: Complete
Reviewer: Senate
Received: 2010-04-22
Decision Date: 2010-04-29
Decision: The Senate approved the proposal as amended.
Next Step: Presidential Approval
Related Files:

Status: Complete
Reviewer: Senate Executive Committee (SEC)
Received: 2010-04-13
Decision Date: 2010-04-20
Decision: The SEC approved placement of the proposal on the 4/291/10 Senate Meeting agenda.
Next Step: Senate Approval
Related Files:

Status: Complete
Reviewer: Joint President/Senate Faculty Merit Pay Task Force
Received: 2009-11-16
Decision Date: 2010-04-13
Decision Due By: 2009-04-02
Decision: The Merit Pay Task Force approved a proposal to make revisions to the existing policy and add approval of unit plans by the Faculty Affairs Committee.
Next Step: SEC Review
Related Files:

Status: Complete
Reviewer: Faculty Affairs Committee
Received: 2009-09-08
Decision Due By: 2010-03-08
Decision: The committee voted to forward its recommendations to the SEC for consideration.
Actions: In reviewing the merit pay policy process, the Faculty Affairs Committee found that the language of the policy states that review should be completed by a task force. The committee voted to send this recommendation to the SEC for review.
Next Step: SEC Review
Related Files:

Status: Complete
Reviewer: Senate Executive Committee (SEC)
Received: 2009-08-27
Decision Date: 2009-09-03
Decision: The SEC voted to charge the Faculty Affairs Committee with review of the issue.
Actions: The SEC discussed the issue at its September 3, 2009, meeting. The request for review came from the existing policy that says that the process should be reviewed every 5 years. Currently, it has been reviewed on this schedule.
Next Step: Faculty Affairs Committee Review
Back to Top