Senate Bill 15-16-18
| Bill ID: | 15-16-18 |
| Name: | Modify the Membership of the Information Technology Council to include a Representative of the University Libraries |
| Proposed: | 12/16/2015 |
| Sponsor: | Gary White, Faculty |
| Proposal: | There is a movement to add a member of the Division of Information Technology to the University Library Council. It is imperative that the Libraries and IT work collaboratively through a range of information technologies as there are mutual issues that both units are addressing in how to best support delivery of quality instruction and the support of research/research programs. Therefore, in addition to having an IT representative on the University Libraries Council, it will likewise be beneficial to having a member from the Libraries as a representative on the Information Technology Council. This representative will help ensure that both the Libraries and IT will work together to effectively address broad issues of technical feasibility, integration of services, fostering synergy between information technology groups across campus, and other issues as part of the Information Technology Council's mandate to provide guidance on these issues to the Chief Information Officer (CIO). In addition, a Libraries representative is important as the IT council addresses broad issues including cybersecurity, IT efficiencies, and enterprise systems and these same issues pertain to the Libraries as they address university-wide issues around supporting research and teaching. The representative of the University Libraries would be ex-officio. The representative would be appointed by the Dean of University Libraries. |
| Active? | No |
Status
| Status: | Completed |
| Completed On: | 03/18/2016 |
History
| Status: | Complete |
| Related Files: |
| Status: | Complete |
| Reviewer: | Senate |
| Received: | 2016-03-02 |
| Decision Date: | 2016-03-09 |
| Decision: | The Senate voted to approve the proposal. |
| Actions: | The Senate reviewed this proposal at its March 9, 2016, meeting and voted to approve the recommendations. |
| Next Step: | Presidential Approval |
| Related Files: |
| Status: | Complete |
| Reviewer: | Senate Executive Committee (SEC) |
| Received: | 2016-02-12 |
| Decision Date: | 2016-02-19 |
| Decision: | The SEC voted to send the report to the Senate for its consideration. |
| Actions: | The SEC discussed the recommendations of the ERG Committee at its 2/19/2016 meeting and voted to forward the recommendations to the Senate for the 3/9/2016 meeting. |
| Next Step: | Senate Review |
| Related Files: |
| Status: | Complete |
| Reviewer: | Elections, Representation, & Governance (ERG) Committee |
| Received: | 2016-01-22 |
| Decision Due By: | 2016-02-16 |
| Decision: | The ERG Committee voted to send its recommendations to the SEC for review. |
| Actions: | The ERG Committee reviewed this charge in Spring 2016 and voted to send their recommendations forward for SEC review at their February 12, 2016 meeting. |
| Next Step: | SEC Review |
| Related Files: |
| Status: | Complete |
| Reviewer: | Senate Executive Committee (SEC) |
| Received: | 2016-01-14 |
| Decision Date: | 2016-01-21 |
| Decision: | The SEC voted to charge the Elections, Representation, and Governance (ERG) Committee with review of this proposal |
| Actions: | The SEC reviewed this proposal at its 1/21/16 meeting and voted to charge the ERG committee with review. |
| Next Step: | ERG Committee Review |
| Related Files: |