Senate Bill 09-10-12
Bill ID: | 09-10-12 |
Name: | Human Relations Code & Committee Name Change |
Proposed: | 09/24/2009 |
Sponsor: | Senate Office |
Proposal: | With the recent name change of the Office of Human Relations Programs (OHRP), we should consider whether the Human Relations Code should be similarly changed to a name that more closely aligns with its goals. If so, should the Senate Human Relations Committee change its name if the two entities that it supports change theirs. |
Active? | No |
Status
Status: | Completed |
Completed On: | 03/05/2010 |
History
Status: | Complete |
Related Files: |
Status: | Complete |
Reviewer: | Senate |
Received: | 2010-01-27 |
Decision Date: | 2010-03-03 |
Decision: | The Senate voted to approve the proposal. |
Actions: | The February 3, 2010 Senate meeting was cancelled due to weather conditions. The Senate considered the proposal on March 3, 2010 and voted to approve the name change for the Code and the Committee. |
Next Step: | Presidential Approval |
Related Files: |
Status: | Complete |
Reviewer: | Senate Executive Committee (SEC) |
Received: | 2010-01-12 |
Decision Date: | 2010-01-19 |
Decision: | The SEC voted to place the item on the February 3, 2010 Senate meeting agenda for consideration. |
Actions: | The SEC reviewed the Human Relations Committee report at its 1/19/10 Senate meeting and voted to send the recommendations to the Senate for review. |
Next Step: | Senate Review |
Related Files: |
Status: | Complete |
Reviewer: | Human Relations Committee |
Received: | 2009-11-12 |
Decision Date: | 2009-11-16 |
Decision Due By: | 2009-12-18 |
Decision: | The committee voted to forward its recommendations to the SEC for consieration. |
Actions: | Chair Val?rie Orlando informed the Human Relations Committee of ERG's endorsement at its meeting on November 16, 2009 and the committee reviewed the letter. After discussion, the committee voted to forward its recommendations to the SEC for consideration. The proposed change to the name of the Human Relations Code was vetted through the President's Legal Office and approved on December 7, 2009. |
Next Step: | SEC Review |
Related Files: |
Status: | Complete |
Reviewer: | Elections, Representation, & Governance (ERG) Committee |
Received: | 2009-11-05 |
Decision Date: | 2009-11-12 |
Decision Due By: | 2009-11-12 |
Decision: | The ERG Committee voted to send a memo to the Human Relations Committee. |
Actions: | ERG Committee Chair Kendra Wells sent a response to Human Relation Committee Chair Valerie Orlando endorsing the Human Relations Committee's request to change its name. |
Next Step: | Human Relations Committee Review |
Related Files: |
Status: | Complete |
Reviewer: | Human Relations Committee |
Received: | 2009-10-02 |
Decision Date: | 2009-10-19 |
Decision Due By: | 2009-12-18 |
Decision: | The committee voted to send the proposal to the ERG Committee for review. |
Actions: | The Human Relations Committee reviewed the proposal in October 2009 and voted to change the name of the Code and the committee. However, while the University Senate Bylaws charge the Human Relations Committee with recommending any appropriate changes in the Code, the committee does not have the authority to change its own name. Therefore, on November 6, 2009, Chair Valerie Orlando sent a letter to the Senate Elections, Representation, and Governance (ERG) Committee, which requested an endorsement of the suggested committee name change. |
Next Step: | ERG Endorsement of suggested committee name change |
Related Files: |
Status: | Complete |
Reviewer: | Senate Executive Committee (SEC) |
Received: | 2009-09-24 |
Decision Date: | 2009-10-01 |
Decision: | The SEC voted to charge the Human Relations Committee with review of the proposal. |
Actions: | The SEC discussed the proposal at its 10/01/09 meeting and voted to send the proposal to the Human Relations Committee for its review after learning that the Office of Human Relations Programs had changed its name to the Office of Diversity and Inclusion to more closely align with its mission. |
Next Step: | Human Relations Committee Review |