Senate Bill 09-10-06
Bill ID: | 09-10-06 |
Name: | Revisions to the Senate Bylaws 2009-2010 |
Proposed: | 08/27/2009 |
Sponsor: | Senate Office |
Proposal: | Make appropriate updates to the Senate Bylaws to more closely align with the current practice. |
Active? | No |
Status
Status: | Completed |
Completed On: | 11/19/2009 |
History
Status: | Complete |
Related Files: |
Status: | Complete |
Reviewer: | Senate |
Received: | 2009-10-30 |
Decision Date: | 2009-11-12 |
Decision: | The Senate voted to approve the proposal as amended. |
Actions: | Senator Arthur Johnson, Faculty, Engineering offered an amendment to include a statement that the alternate with highest vote count would get first preference for meetings where an alternate is needed. The Senate approved the amendment. |
Next Step: | Presidential Approval |
Related Files: |
Status: | Complete |
Reviewer: | Senate Executive Committee (SEC) |
Received: | 2009-10-20 |
Decision Date: | 2009-10-29 |
Decision: | The SEC voted to place the item on the November 12, 2009 Senate meeting agenda. |
Actions: | The SEC discussed the committee's recommendations at its 10/29/09 meeting and voted to forward the revisions to the Senate for review. |
Next Step: | Senate Review |
Related Files: |
Status: | Complete |
Reviewer: | Elections, Representation, & Governance (ERG) Committee |
Received: | 2009-09-08 |
Decision Date: | 2009-10-15 |
Decision Due By: | 2009-10-19 |
Decision: | The ERG committee voted to forward its recommendations to the SEC for review. |
Actions: | The ERG Committee discussed the proposal in September and October 2009. They voted to recommend three revisions to the Bylaws regarding CUSF, the Committee on Committees, and the Human Relations Committee. |
Next Step: | SEC Review |
Related Files: |
Status: | Complete |
Reviewer: | Senate Executive Committee (SEC) |
Received: | 2009-08-27 |
Decision Date: | 2009-09-03 |
Decision: | The SEC voted to charge the ERG Committee with review of the proposal. |
Actions: | The SEC reviewed the proposal at its 9/3/09 meeting and voted to charge ERG with its review. |
Next Step: | ERG Committee Review |